"

2 Chapter 2: Criminological Theories and Serial Killers

Biological Theories

Lombroso’s Theory of Atavism:

Cesare Lombroso, a pioneering criminologist in the 19th century, introduced the idea that criminals could be identified by certain physical characteristics, such as a heavy jaw or a low forehead, suggesting they were evolutionary throwbacks or “atavistic” individuals. According to Lombroso, these traits indicated that criminals were biologically inferior and had reverted to a more primitive stage of human development. Although Lombroso’s theory has been largely debunked in modern criminology, it contributed to early ideas about criminal predisposition, with some suggesting that physical or genetic traits might influence criminal behavior. Today, while the concept of atavism is no longer considered scientifically valid, discussions about genetic or physiological anomalies in serial killers sometimes refer back to Lombroso’s early work.

Genetic Predisposition:

The theory of genetic predisposition posits that some individuals may inherit traits that make them more prone to criminal behavior. These inherited traits might influence behavior patterns such as impulsivity, aggression, or a tendency toward violence. Research in the field of behavioral genetics has explored the possibility that certain genetic factors can increase the likelihood of criminality, including among serial killers. Some researchers argue that serial killers may be born with a genetic predisposition toward violence or other antisocial behaviors, which could help explain why some individuals engage in systematic, repeated acts of violence.

Brain Abnormalities:

This theory suggests that neurological factors, such as brain damage or abnormalities in brain functioning, can contribute to criminal behavior. Key areas of the brain that regulate impulse control, empathy, and decision-making are particularly relevant in understanding criminal behavior. In serial killers, studies have suggested that abnormalities in regions like the prefrontal cortex—the area responsible for moral decision-making and self-control—could play a significant role in their violent actions. Some evidence links brain injuries, developmental disorders, or neurological dysfunctions to heightened aggression, contributing to a serial killer’s lack of impulse control and moral reasoning.

Psychological Theories

Psychodynamic Theory (Freud)

Sigmund Freud’s psychodynamic theory posits that early childhood experiences, particularly those involving trauma or neglect, shape adult behavior. According to Freud, unresolved unconscious conflicts from childhood can manifest in maladaptive behaviors, including aggression or violence. Many serial killers report histories of early life trauma, such as physical or sexual abuse, which may align with Freud’s ideas. These early experiences could create deep-seated unconscious conflicts that manifest as violent tendencies later in life, as the individual attempts to resolve past traumas through criminal acts.

Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD)

Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD) is a psychological condition characterized by persistent patterns of disregard for the rights of others, deceitfulness, impulsivity, and a lack of empathy. These symptoms are often found in individuals who engage in criminal behavior, including serial killers. Many serial killers exhibit traits consistent with APD, such as a chronic lack of remorse and a tendency to view others as tools or obstacles rather than human beings. APD contributes to the serial killer’s ability to commit murder without guilt or moral conflict, allowing them to kill without emotional disturbance.

Attachment Theory

John Bowlby’s attachment theory focuses on the importance of early emotional bonds between children and their caregivers. Disruptions in these early attachments, such as neglect or abuse, can lead to difficulties in forming healthy relationships in adulthood. Serial killers often have dysfunctional attachments to their caregivers or family members, and this early detachment can manifest as a lack of empathy in adulthood. These disrupted early bonds may make it harder for serial killers to form normal emotional connections with others, which can result in violent behavior and a failure to experience guilt or remorse.

Sociological Theories

Strain Theory (Robert Merton)

Strain theory, developed by sociologist Robert Merton, suggests that crime occurs when individuals experience strain or frustration due to the inability to achieve socially accepted goals through legitimate means. When legitimate avenues to success are blocked, individuals may turn to deviant behavior to cope. In the case of serial killers, strain could be caused by personal failures, rejection, or an inability to achieve social or personal goals, leading to violent behavior as a means of exerting control or expressing anger. These feelings of frustration may manifest in the form of brutal acts against others.

Social Learning Theory (Albert Bandura)

Social learning theory, developed by Albert Bandura, proposes that criminal behavior is learned through interactions with others, particularly through reinforcement from peers, family members, or media. People adopt behaviors that are rewarded or go unchallenged by those around them. Serial killers may learn violent or criminal behaviors from influential figures in their lives or from exposure to violent media. Additionally, they may come to rationalize their behavior as acceptable through the reinforcement of others who share similar violent tendencies.

Labeling Theory

Labeling theory suggests that individuals who are labeled as “deviant” or “criminal” may internalize these labels and begin to engage in behaviors that align with societal expectations for criminals. This self-fulfilling prophecy can perpetuate criminal behavior. In the case of serial killers, many may have been labeled as troublemakers or deviant during their childhoods. This early labeling may influence their identity formation, helping them to embrace criminal behavior as part of their self-concept. Such labels may also provide justification for their violent actions.

Social Disorganization Theory

Social disorganization theory emphasizes that crime is more likely to occur in communities where there is a breakdown of social control and a lack of shared values. In areas with high levels of poverty, instability, or social fragmentation, individuals may become detached from social bonds and community norms, which can lead to deviant behavior. Serial killers may emerge from such environments, where feelings of isolation and detachment from society contribute to violent behavior. These communities may lack the social structure needed to prevent or deter such acts of violence.

Additional Theories

Routine Activities Theory

Routine activities theory posits that crime occurs when three elements converge: a motivated offender, a suitable target, and a lack of capable guardianship. The theory emphasizes the role of opportunity in facilitating crime. In the case of serial killers, they are often motivated offenders seeking vulnerable, accessible victims. A lack of capable guardians—such as law enforcement, surveillance, or witnesses—creates an opportunity for them to commit their crimes without detection.

Neutralization Theory

Neutralization theory, developed by Gresham Sykes and David Matza, suggests that offenders use rationalizations to justify their criminal actions and neutralize their guilt. Serial killers often employ techniques of neutralization, such as “denial of responsibility” (blaming their actions on past trauma) or “denial of the victim” (viewing their victims as less than human). These justifications help them avoid feeling moral conflict about their crimes, enabling them to continue killing without remorse.

Feminist Theory

Feminist criminology examines how gender, power dynamics, and societal norms shape criminal behavior. Feminist scholars argue that societal expectations around masculinity contribute to criminality, particularly among men. Many serial killers are male, and feminist theorists suggest that their violent behavior stems from societal pressures to dominate and control women. Female victims, in particular, may be targeted as symbols of male power and control, reflecting broader gender inequalities.

Cognitive Theory

Cognitive theory focuses on how individuals process information and form beliefs that influence their behavior. Distorted thinking patterns or cognitive distortions may lead to criminal actions. Serial killers may have skewed perceptions, such as believing they are entitled to kill or that their victims deserve to die. These cognitive distortions allow them to justify their actions and lack empathy for their victims, making it easier for them to commit violent acts without moral conflict.

Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary psychology suggests that behaviors, including violence, may have evolved as strategies for survival and reproductive success. From an evolutionary perspective, violent behavior could have been adaptive for gaining resources, asserting dominance, or securing mates. Serial killers might view their violence as a means of asserting power, gaining control, or fulfilling certain sexual desires. These behaviors, while extreme, may be seen as exaggerated forms of strategies that once served survival or reproductive purposes.

Crime Pattern Theory (Environmental Criminology)

Environmental criminology focuses on how the physical and social environment influences criminal behavior. Crime pattern theory examines the relationship between geographic location and the likelihood of criminal activity. Serial killers often operate in specific areas they are familiar with, where they know the environment and can select vulnerable victims. They may also choose locations where they believe they can avoid detection, taking advantage of their knowledge of local crime patterns and the lack of surveillance.

Theories of Power and Control (Masculinity Theory)

Masculinity theory explores how societal norms surrounding masculinity and power dynamics influence criminal behavior. It suggests that violent actions, particularly by men, may stem from a desire to assert control over others. Many male serial killers may be motivated by a need to dominate and control their victims, often targeting women to fulfill this need. These acts of violence can be seen as extreme manifestations of societal expectations of male power and dominance within a patriarchal framework.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Uncovering Serial Killers Copyright © by College of Southern Idaho is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.